Hi Riley... There was a wikia contributor just messing Claire's profile with a word, Dildo and other language uses in profanity are added up in the profile. Especially all the happenings in her game appearance are totally messed up really big and also he added up with Eragon's involvement. If you see his writing in Claire's profile he's messing up everything and he's gonna do that to Polly's profile too :/
Rather simple, there was no real purpose behind it aside it from being compared to another series. Number 3 of our blog rules explicitly states it must have a thesis or a purpose, simply comparing one game in the series to another series just doesn't cut it.
"Blog pages are wiki pages like any other, except that they are framed so that they have only one author. Edits are typically of the non-substantive variety -- that is, edits for formatting, grammar, layout, wikification are accepted, but changes to the authors tone or thesis are discouraged." That is exactly what the blogging policy states, but when my blog is deleted, the reason is "And the only contributor was..." Am I too new?
And, well, unless a non rail shooter remake of RE2 is made, the way she appeared is the one I had changed it to earlier. I have beaten Resident Evil 2 both times, and not once are her jean shorts blue, their red. Before you remind me, I have watched on youtube the Chronicles games and played Operation Raccoon City. I don't count those as remakes because it's not every moment that ever happend in RE2.
Blogger316 wrote: And, well, unless a non rail shooter remake of RE2 is made, the way she appeared is the one I had changed it to earlier. I have beaten Resident Evil 2 both times, and not once are her jean shorts blue, their red. Before you remind me, I have watched on youtube the Chronicles games and played Operation Raccoon City. I don't count those as remakes because it's not every moment that ever happend in RE2.
I think you're confused what a remake is... severely
Actually, a remake is something redone similarly or differently, but I meant as in not a very good one, I know I should specify next time, but a very good remake to me for 2 would let players move around instead a rail shooter.
Blogger316 wrote: Actually, a remake is something redone similarly or differently, but I meant as in not a very good one, I know I should specify next time, but a very good remake to me for 2 would let players move around instead a rail shooter.
You still are confused or not explaining well, why do you keep bringing up remakes but then talking about railshooters, darkside chronicles is not a remake in any form so why are you bringing it up. Resident Evil Remake is a remake, Darkside Chronicles is not a remake, that's like calling Umbrella Chronicles a remake of remake, 0 and 3. And what do you mean "as in not a very good one" context is important.
You've completely ignored the point of a remake. A remake is a complete redesign of an already established work, and as such it's legible to have different story, characters, etc. Umbrella Chronicles and Darkside Chronicles don't fall under this category because they don't change any of the already established plot, with the exception of certain elements such as Steve being with Claire a majority of the CV segment when he wasn't in the primary game, although it can be argued that because Leon's telling what he knows about the events he got it wrong, that's not a remake.
Hmmm...i see that you reverted my edits regarding Chris and Jill's relationship, they obviously are more than just friends we can cleary see that in RE5, besides i am not into fan factions, i am going to leave a neutral sentence in their pages relationship section like "confidant" and "close partner".
There is nothing suggesting anything more than a close friendship Tesshu.
Confidant refers as "a person with whom one shares a secret or private matter, trusting them not to repeat it to others.", essentially listing them as someone who they'd tell their darkest secrets to, this doesn't really match with the relationship.
This implies there is still something secret what only the two share, what evidence is there to suggest they're more than friends? Chris' undying determination to get her back? That's hardly enough evidence to suffice, they've fought through dear amounts of shit like that and given how it's literally been those two going through that sorta thing it's not exactly a surprise he's doing everything he can to find Jill.
The two have a great deal of friendship and loyalty to others which can be misinterpreted as an attraction to the two, but there's nothing supporting it. As someone who's got an INCREDIBLY close friendship with one person, I do find it almost ignorant when people assume this for the two to be in love with each other.
I've reverted it again as confidant seems almost inaccurate to how close the relationship between them is, there's nothing explicitly saying the two have a thing for each other, it's not like someone's asked if one loves the other or they flat out admit it, it's been established numerous times that Chris is incredibly loyal to those he considers friends.
In your previous edit you explicitly referred to them as being lovers yet nothing from the games or developers themselves has ever elaborated on this aside from a few comments by Parker yet that is assumption on his part, Chris nor Jill have ever confirmed the extent of their relationship.